Reddit at FTQT

Well the FTQT Benasque workshop has come and gone. It has a fantastic experience to spend two weeks with many smart people interested in quantum error-correction and fault-tolerance.

One of the unexpected, and unplanned from my perspective, things to happen was a Reddit Ask-Me-Anything. It was setup by James Wootton and several of us joined in, all sat in the same sofa area for a couple of hours. It was hilarious to hear someone gasp, “O no, someone has asked if quantum computing implies P=NP” quickly followed by “I’m on it!” from elsewhere in the room (I think Steve Flammia was the first on this one).

Below are a couple of photos of the AMA in progress. There are a few more pictures on the Benasque website. The lightening the main room wasn’t great and I only took my compact camera, so unfortunately a lot of pictures during talks went straight to trash.

P1110381

P1110382

How I got into quantum computing

The UK funding body EPSRC asked me to write a short general audience piece for their website covering my research and the motivation behind it. What I wrote ended up being a bit more about my personal journey than the new science.

I remember being in the canteen in Berlin, discussing with colleagues how we got into physics. It seemed most people had an inspirational physics teacher. For me, an inclination towards physics always seems to come from further back than any physics class I can remember. You can read a bit about it here

FTQT 2016

For a while, me, Dan Browne and Michael have been planning a conference on Fault-Tolerance theory that is happening next year in Benasque, Spain. We are happy to be announcing it this week, and below is a short blurb and poster

Fault-Tolerant Quantum Technologies
14th-17th August 2016, Benasque, Spain.

A two week conference on Fault-Tolerant Quantum Technologies held at the Centro de Ciencias de Benasque Pedro Pascual in Benasque, Spain. The workshop will host a small number of morning talks reporting the latest advances while providing ample free time for researchers to exchange ideas and strike up new collaborations.

Invited speakers include (alphabetically):
– Hector Bombin (Copenhagen, Denmark)
– Sergey Bravyi (IBM, USA)
– Steve Flammia (Sydney, Australia) TBC
– Jay Gambetta (IBM, USA)
– Vadym Kliuchnikov (Microsoft, USA)
– Barbara Terhal (Aachen, Germany)

The programme will consist of a limited number of contributed talks. These talks are intended to guide discussions and interactions, with most of the meeting being unscheduled and reserved for collaboration.

Register at http://benasque.org/2016ftqt/ before 20th June 2016

For general enquiries contact: ftqtbenasque@gmail.com

Conference poster

Download:
small jpeg version here
larger vector graphics here

[EDIT: some invited speakers and deadlines changed since the poster was made. Always visit the conference website for up-to date information]

FTQTposter11

The hick’s building

Just a couple of snaps of the Hick’s building that is home to Sheffield’s Physics and Astronomy department, and the maths department on the top floors.

IMG_8180

IMG_8178

Would like to have taken the same shots with the sun behind the camera. This should be possible in the afternoon, but the weather turned poor by then.

I’m hiring!

Recently, I was very happy to be awarded an EPSRC fellowship for research into the theory of designing quantum computers that tolerate the noisiness of our world. This means I’m hiring a post doctoral assistant for 3+ years. If you have a PhD in quantum computing or information theory and want to work with me, then please apply. Otherwise, please like or share.
http://www.quantiki.org/…/post-doctoral-researcher-faulttol…
and for more info see:
http://tinyurl.com/o2tove2

jobadvert2

The Setun Computer

Last week I gave a talk at QEC Zurich, for which I had decided to speak about the potential of quantum computers built from d-level quantum systems. When preparing for the talk I discovered that not all conventional computers have used binary logic. In 1958, the first Setun computer was built at Moscow State University using ternary, or 3 state, logic. I was fascinated by this curiosity of computing, and so decided to kick off my talk with a brief mention of it. Here I’ll say a bit more about it, but really I want to invite any knowledgeable readers to tell me more about Setun! I’ve found some sources in English, but the vast majority of the literature is in Russian.

setun
Снимок Сетунь“. Licensed under Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons.

Above is Setun’s exterior. Under the hood, it represented numbers in balanced ternary logic. Each possible value is best labelled as 0,1 or -1. Given a string of such numbers
\{ a_{n}, a_{n-1},\ldots,a_2, a_1 \} ,
they would represent a number
x = \sum_{k=1}^n 3^k a_k .
For example, the numbers from -5 to 5 are represented as
\begin{array}{r|rcccl}  x & \{&a_2,& a_1,& a_0 &\} \\ \hline \hline  -5 & \{&-1,& 1,&1 &\} \\  -4 & \{&0,& -1,&-1 &\} \\  -3 & \{&0,& -1,& 0 &\} \\  -2 & \{&0,& -1,& 1 &\} \\  -1 & \{&0,& 0,&-1 &\} \\  0 & \{&0,& 0,& 0 &\} \\  1 & \{&0,& 0,&1 &\} \\  2 & \{&0,& 1,& -1 &\} \\  3 & \{&0,& 1,& 0 &\} \\  4 & \{&0,& 1,& 1 &\} \\  5 & \{&1,& -1,& -1 &\} \\  \end{array}.
Unlike in binary, negative numbers are naturally captured by this system without an ad hoc prefix for the sign. Many basic arithmetical operations are particularly simple. Rounding of a number to leading significant figures can be achieved by just truncating a sequence, whereas binary rounding potentially depends on the whole sequence of bits. In The Art of Computing, Donald Knuth gives a fantastic survey of different number systems, and was so enamored with balanced ternary that he said it is “perhaps the prettiest number system”.

The development of Setun was lead by Sergei Sobolev and Nikolay Brusentsov. Sobolev was a mathematician of considerable renown and influence within the Soveit union who was in the 1950s the head of computational mathematics in Moscow State University. Brusentsov was a younger engineer keen to get his teeth into modern computing, and recalling his first meeting with Sobolev said,

When I first came to Sergei Sobolev’s office, it seemed as if I was enveloped in sunlight – his face looked that kind and open. We hit it off immediately and I will be forever grateful to providence for leading me to this remarkable man, a bright mathematician and knowledgeable scientist, one of the first people who understood the significance of computers.

Together they conceived built a research team and conceived the initial design. Though Sobolev was pivotal in getting the project of the ground, Brusentsov stayed committed to Setun as Sobolev’s attention became diverted. Brunsentov recalled,

Sobolev was the heart and soul of this project. Unfortunately, his participation in our creative work ended in the early 1960s when he moved to Novosibirsk. All of his later involvement revolved around perpetual fighting with bureaucrats for the right to do the work we believed in.

Whereas, it seems Setun really became Brusentsov’s life long passion. Later in life he continued to write papers on Setun and ternary computing, until he passed away just several weeks ago.


Nikolay Brusentsov
7 February 1925 – 4 December 2014

The decision to work in ternary came earlier, and it is claimed the elegance of the number system allowed them to achieve the equivalent computing power with fewer components. At the time, transistors were not yet available and vacuum tubes were too large for a compact computer. Therefore, the decision was made to build it using magnetic cores and diodes. The first Setun was a success and they went on to built 50 such machines. However, it was always a university project, not fully endorsed by the Soviet government, and viewed suspiciously by factory management. Despite requests from abroad for Setuns to be exported, the orders were not met. Against these obstacles the Setun fizzled out, and Brusentsov’s group was moved to offices in a hostel! At least, this is the picture painted by the few sources I’ve found and read. The story is of a ingenious computing architecture that was simply the Betamax of its time. The accuracy of this narrative is hard to judge. I suppose the interesting question is how a modern ternary computer would compete or even excel against its binary contemporaries. Or even, how a quantum computer would fare by going beyond the conventional qubit paradigm.

sources:
Malinovsky, Pioneers of Soviet Computing
Russian Virtual Computer Musuem
Donald Knuth, The Art of Computing